Meditation and creativity: some first evidence

By | May 5, 2012

Over the last one and a half years or so, I was repeatedly asked whether there would be any current empirical evidence that meditation practice would improve creativity. Also, when I recently discussed with Lama Jigme Rinpoche possible future directions for our research, he pointed out that studying the link between meditation and creativity would be important. So, certainly this topic has been on my radar for a while.

It is thus exciting to see that colleagues from Leiden University, Netherlands, made a first step towards addressing this question. A couple of weeks ago Lorenza Colzato, Ayca Ozturk and Bernhard Hommel published the article “Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking” in the open access Journal Frontiers in Psychology. In this article they report a study where they compared the influence of two types of meditation on convergent and divergent thinking. In their classification of the two meditations they follow a distinction suggested by Antoine Lutz et al. in their 2008 article “Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation” [pdf]. The first type of meditation is referred to as focused attention (FA), labelling meditations that aim at training and improving the ability to focus and maintain attention. Typically, a meditator would practice to focus all their attention on a chosen object, as for instance the sensation of one’s own breathing, at the expense of all other internal or external sensations. This is contrasted with a second type, open monitoring (OM). In this approach to meditation, all internal and external sensations are experienced with the same openness, without focusing on specific objects or sensations.

In the study 19 participants with moderate levels of meditation experience were asked to either engage in the FA-meditation or in the OM-meditation and were afterwards tested on two tasks, which test convergent thinking and divergent thinking. In the convergent thinking task participants were asked to find a common associate for three unrelated words. For instance, when they were presented with the words time, hair and stretch a possible answer would be “long”. In the divergent thinking task participants were asked to list as many uses for common household items (e.g. brick, shoe, newspaper) as possible. According to one model of creativity, convergent and divergent thinking modes represent different components of human creativity; the former a process of generating one possible solution to a particular problem, the latter a process allowing many new ideas to be generated where more than one solution is correct.

How many uses for this brick can you list?

As hypothesised, the results clearly showed that the meditators improved in divergent thinking after engaging in the OM-meditation, whereas the expected improvement in convergent thinking after FA-meditation did not occur.

With other words, after meditators practiced opening their mind in a balanced way to all arising thoughts, feelings and sensations they had access to more ideas how common objects might be used in novel ways, possibly as a result of engaging their mind in a less controlled, more flexible way.

These results tell us at least two things. First, that different ways of meditating influence our cognitive processing mode in distinct ways. Second, engaging in OM-meditation, where our attention is more evenly distributed, facilitates generating more diverse and divergent ideas and may thus contribute to more flexible or creative states of mind.

It is worth noting, that the model of convergent and divergent thinking is only one of several ways how creativity is approached and there are many other aspects to creativity not captured in this way. As a first step into this exciting topic, the results are certainly encouraging.


Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A. and Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology 3:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116

© 2012, Peter Malinowski. All rights reserved.

4 thoughts on “Meditation and creativity: some first evidence

  1. Andy

    Several artists of my acquaintance meditate prior to commencing work on their creative projects. I have discussed the process with two of them and it seems that it allows them to be more centred with more effective concentration but at the same time more open – which aligns with the results of the Om meditators in the current article. It would be interesting to conduct this research with established artists.

  2. Peter Malinowski Post author

    Andy, thank you for this observation. It is indeed very interesting and definetely worth exploring/studying further.
    It may be of interest that we are currently in discussion with colleagues from a leading creative media arts centre here in Liverpool ( FACT – Foundation for Art and Creative Technology), exploring opportunitites for studying the role of meditation and mindfulness in the creative process.

    I think your comment also points to something rather important – and this is that creativity goes much further than the interply of convergent and divergent think.

    Cheers, Peter

  3. Pingback: Mindfulness and Creativity | ryanwallacebass

  4. Pingback: The Science of Meditation (And How to Do It Right)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.